I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to authenticate logins, deliver better content and provide statistical analysis. You can adjust your browser settings to prevent our site from using cookies, but doing so will prevent some aspects of the site from functioning properly.
|Yrme 06.22.2015 13:01|
I'd suggest that there needs to be a place for mercenaries in settlement-level conflict. I think that in private wars between companies - feuds - the mercenary is either a hired killer (taking rep losses outside of the company) or a ringer (inserted into the company as a member, though he really has no affiliation*). I think company alliances/defensive pacts as suggested by the OP should be long-term attachments that other companies can take into consideration during their planning.
* I don't think company hopping should be prohibited, just as I don't thing PvP outside of 'sanctioned' methods should be prohibited. There just needs to be enough downside to make it a real decision; sometimes the lesser evil of choices.
At some point, crowdforging suggestions seem to be like fan fiction. Some good, some bad, some repetitious and predictable. But maybe there are some gems out there.