I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to authenticate logins, deliver better content and provide statistical analysis. You can adjust your browser settings to prevent our site from using cookies, but doing so will prevent some aspects of the site from functioning properly.
Bob 03.31.2017 10:36 | |
---|---|
|
BobMidnight Of course, your crafting will be worse and your ability to defend yourself will be worse while in town, so lack of support could still be a significant issue. |
The Eternal Balance 04.01.2017 09:10 | |
---|---|
|
Bob That would be great - players use company hoping to regularly work around game mechanics.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
|
Paddy Fitzpatrick 04.01.2017 14:35 | |
---|---|
|
Wouldn't you just hop into the company that has the highest support levels anyway? Unless they have been cut off from all support or it goes back to the more unforgiving losing all support immediately version I don't see how this will change much. Losing influence immediately would give some pause.
Paddy Fitzpatrick - Rí Ruírec of Fianna, roaming bands of noble warriors!
Member of Aragon Alliance and home of bandits, privateers, and anyone looking to get away from the shackles of law. Find us on PFO Discord |
Paddy Fitzpatrick 04.01.2017 14:40 | |
---|---|
|
I would also work see about alliance mechanics and how that would work too. That would probably be the other major way to do this since supporting allies in a tight is one of the main reasons company hopping happens in the first place.
Paddy Fitzpatrick - Rí Ruírec of Fianna, roaming bands of noble warriors!
Member of Aragon Alliance and home of bandits, privateers, and anyone looking to get away from the shackles of law. Find us on PFO Discord |
Flari-Merchant 04.06.2017 09:56 | |
---|---|
|
Is it already the case that Allies can't Feud Allies? |
Decius 04.06.2017 10:37 | |
---|---|
|
Bringslite of StaalgardPretty sure not. At least, companies can feud other companies within the same settlement. |
Bob 04.06.2017 10:53 | |
---|---|
|
Bringslite of Staalgard I don't believe there are any restrictions, so any company can feud any other company. That could potentially cause some weirdness about how guards react when conflicted about who to support, but in general we want to allow we don't want to mechanically enforce things that are better dealt with by settlement/alliance leaders. If you like your companies fighting amongst themselves, let them go at it. If you don't, then boot them. The only mechanical things we really want on that are the current one-hour minimum delay for starting feuds, and the incoming 48-hour delay before you can start capturing territory. |
Decius 04.06.2017 11:12 | |
---|---|
|
I haven't had companies within the settlement feud since all settlement members were blue/unattackable. Might need to check if fued red has priority over settlement blue, or if it even should. |
You are a Troll 04.06.2017 15:26 | |
---|---|
|
I don't think this question has been answered yet: will Blacklists include the tavern in the settlement or no? |
Bob 04.06.2017 15:29 | |
---|---|
|
You are a Troll Yup. To be technically pedantic, permissions will include the ability to control who uses your settlement tavern, and you will be able to set the permissions for those on your blacklist. |