I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to authenticate logins, deliver better content and provide statistical analysis. You can adjust your browser settings to prevent our site from using cookies, but doing so will prevent some aspects of the site from functioning properly.
Flari-Merchant 01.10.2018 19:28 | |
---|---|
|
EdamMakes sense. Well within my available purchasing power. Thx Edam ![]() |
Flari-Merchant 01.10.2018 19:18 | |
---|---|
|
With all due respect because I know that Paizo is seriously between a rock and a hard place trying to keep this game alive, without workable revenue, and all the while improving it enough to attract a larger population; you certainly are putting quite a bit of "stick" into a game that costs $14.95/month. Please do not get me wrong, one of the things that I like about this game is that it is not an easy guided-handholding tour from 1-20, from weak to substantially/confidently powerful. I think that is one of it's strengths. However, we(the players) are at the same time, enduring a long drawn out experiment of a sort. Throughout we are having to adjust for periodic changes, use our XP for expensive work-arounds then end up not needing them or having something change that makes them come out differently. The game is a lot different now than it was back on day one. That is great and that is encouraging. Games should always strive to improve but this is like enduring a paid Beta. A long paid beta. Hopefully, GW/Paizo has definitive records of how much XP each account has paid for and can eventually consider offering "Respect/Rebuilds" as a kindly reward for all of us loyal fans that have hung in so long. |
Flari-Merchant 01.10.2018 10:13 | |
---|---|
|
@ BobBob Thanks for the whole of the fixes but I hope that through iterations, this can be even further refined. Someday it would be pretty neat if a figure behind a wall, rock or some other cover can shoot at a target either also having "some" cover or none. In other words, have a working "cover" calculation mechanic. |
Flari-Merchant 01.10.2018 09:48 | |
---|---|
|
That reads reasonably. Thank You ![]() |
Flari-Merchant 01.10.2018 08:50 | |
---|---|
|
BobGiorgio @ Bob Do you guys reckon that you will put what you are still planning out as EE 15 and hold off on any social tools until EE 16+, or are you thinking of swapping out the other (rulesPDF, Tickets) and doing some social tools for EE 15? |
Flari-Merchant 01.09.2018 09:37 | |
---|---|
|
Get rid of tokens and put some of these "Token Powers" into other things such as salvage items like relics, fragments, even "Goblin Bags" or please adjust lesser token drops to "lower lvl mobs. ![]() |
Flari-Merchant 01.09.2018 09:26 | |
---|---|
|
harnelootSee the bold above. Right (currently) now the only thing that has changed is Caer Coedweg being fully open and accessible. Not all other "Dominion" settlements are fully or partially closed according to the settlement leader's will.Flari-Merchant As is also "current" policy, if you find yourself unable to access any "Dominion" settlement, all that is needed is to contact that settlement's leader (through direct or proxy contact) so that he/she knows that you would like that changed. This would probably be an agreement between you and them to not be aggressive to our members and anything else that particular leader has concerns about. Several of our Leaders are not interested in playing at workarounds with the "Blacklist" and "Unaffiliated" systems and having a big mess to edit later. That is likely why some groups or persons find themselves unable to access certain parts of The Dominion's existing facilities. I like you and have respect for you, Xyzzy, which is why I am(once again) re-informing you of this current policy. As things change and mechanics come online, The Dominion is considering some significant changes but it is not for me to detail those yet. ![]() |
Flari-Merchant 01.08.2018 12:59 | |
---|---|
|
BobFlari-Merchant Yes, well I can see how that would leave the option open to structure the support mechanic the way that you have. Honestly though, I do have some concerns about future ramifications but I am aware that how people end up using mechanics rarely ends up as bad as imagined. Just look at all the years of debate about griefers. Never materialized. ![]() P.S We plan to have all of our structures available to at least all that are not aggressive to us or our friends. |
Flari-Merchant 01.08.2018 11:41 | |
---|---|
|
You have demonstrated that you ARE blacklisted in some places. You have not demonstrated that it is a practice that the server accepts without grumbling about, making it a sort of "taboo". but, the point is: It doesn't mean much that a settlement can have zero buildings because the server(in general) is willing to allow anyone to train and craft at their facilities… |
Flari-Merchant 01.08.2018 10:29 | |
---|---|
|
Maxen+2! |