Cookies Disclaimer

I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to authenticate logins, deliver better content and provide statistical analysis. You can adjust your browser settings to prevent our site from using cookies, but doing so will prevent some aspects of the site from functioning properly.

All posts created by Notta

Notta
Thanks, when prioritizing things beyond the immediate horizon, please consider dungeons as a high priority. I do think it is something that would widen the appeal of the game and bring in new/more players.
Notta
Thanks, when prioritizing things beyond the immediate horizon, please consider dungeons as a high priority. I do think it is something that would widen the appeal of the game and bring,g in new/more players.
Notta
Thanks for the update Lisa. Some of the future changes were interesting but one topic of interest (at least to me and I hope others)was not discussed. For me, this was one of the reasons I started to play and if it is not going to be part of the game I would have to seriously consider letting my subscription lapse.

Initially there was more planned for PVE than escalations. There was going to be dungeons. Are there any plans to add this aspect or is that not part of the current path forward?
Notta
A must watch
Notta

Arthur: I am your king!
Woman: Well I didn't vote for you!
Arthur: You don't vote for kings.
Woman: Well how'd you become king then?
[Angelic music plays…]
Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering silmite
held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine
providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why I am your
king!
Dennis interrupting: Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin'
swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power
derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic
ceremony!
———————–
Dennis: Oh, but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just
because some watery tart threw a sword at you!
———————–
Dennis: Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some
moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-8bqQ-C1PSE
Notta
It's an autonomous collective.
Notta
harneloot
Well, I only claim one single hex (swamp monster hex) and planted my Freehold there to show that (yes I know there are no in-game mechanics to enforce this claim, but there is in-game pvp smile Anyone who visits without invitation will be attacked. Any escalation myself and other residents of Hammerfall can't clear out in a reasonable time will see invites going out in General Chat for assistance. If you have been snooping around and see something in the swamp that is tasty, feel free to offer help by contacting me on the PFO Discord or Whisper me in game. I am more than willing to party up with most people….but I do not like sneaky trespassers who slink about in the middle of the night smile

(yes, I know my *middle-of-the-night* might be someone else's morning, afternoon or evening…just be polite and ask first…or not. We have what we hold).

Notta also has a freehold in the swamp and is in league with Harnaloot and his alts and defends the claim he has on the hex.
Notta
Speaking as an individual, not as a member of a settlement, if the group claiming the hex does not protest the fact that others are working the escalation or acts against said others, then that group, in essence, is surrendering its rights to that claim until such time as it protests the violation of said claim or acts against the violators.

Once protest or action in response to a violation of a claim occurs, what happens next depends on the nature of the group violating said claim. If that group was lawful, I would assume they would recognize the claim; the response of other groups would, I suppose, vary by alignment.

Expecting "server wide consensus" is irrational.
Notta
Naysayers and haters, now is the time to man up and do the right thing, self-purge yourselves from the game and the forums. Do I see the path ahead as ideal? No, but I do see it as getting the game onto something more than life support. What is needed now are for those who want to see the game succeed to to start to play again, have some fun, and provide constructive feedback while recognizing the limits of the possible during this new phase. What we do not need are trolls who take perverse pleasure from finding ways to make the game miserable for those who want to play it and chase away newcomers in some twisted power trip based on slaughtering newbies. The best thing that could possibly happen is for you and your ilk to slink away to spread your pestilence throughout other games.

Lisa and Co.,wishing you all the best of luck, I am in for the long haul.

Notta Rowagh (main), Notta Rawagh (gatherer), and Notta Tumah (1000 pt alt).
Notta
Bob
As part of cleaning up the settlement ownership list, we're going to switch from attaching ownership to email addresses and instead attach it to individual characters. Those characters will need to be on active accounts and will need to have leader rank in the settlement's founding company. Settlements will also be able to list multiple owners, alternates for decision-making when owners can't be reached quickly enough, and/or successors. However, only characters from active accounts can be on any of those lists.

I'll be reaching out to the owners of each settlement individually to get that all set up. If I'm unable to contact the official owner of a settlement, I'll transfer ownership to the highest-ranked leader/member when there's an obvious choice, or work with the highest-ranked leadership/membership to pick a new owner when there isn't an obvious choice.
Will there be a cleaning up of Small Holdings that were owned by now banned players?